Skip to content
East Sussex Counts — East Sussex, in numbers.Local help →

Meads · Eastbourne

Meads: your neighbourhood

Meads electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

People aged 65 or over: 38.5% here, compared with 24.5% across Eastbourne (14 percentage points higher).

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented privately: 36% here, compared with 27% across Eastbourne (9.8 percentage points higher).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented from a council or housing association: 4% here, compared with 13% across Eastbourne (8.8 percentage points lower).

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

38.5%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

4,211 out of 10,938.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

6.4%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

704 out of 10,938.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

10,939

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

10,939 out of 10,939.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

38.5%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

3,805 out of 9,878.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

56.7%

21 March 2021 · Meads

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

3,248 out of 5,727.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

17.9%

21 March 2021 · Meads

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,023 out of 5,727.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

56.1%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

5,549 out of 9,892.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

40.4%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

3,997 out of 9,892.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

3.9%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

384 out of 9,892.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

16.4%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

1,618 out of 9,878.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

36%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

2,081 out of 5,724.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

40.7%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

4,026 out of 9,892.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

4%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

240 out of 5,724.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

3.5%

21 March 2021 · Meads

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

346 out of 9,892.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Meads ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Meads ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 194 mapped crimes in September 2024; 182 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Meads
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 202419428
October 202418322
November 202418721
December 202415728
January 202513626
February 202514623
March 202519745
April 202520035
May 202517332
June 202524334
July 202520842
August 202517940
September 202516030
October 202513436
November 202515932
December 202515719
January 202611738
February 202613452
March 202617657
April 202618361
May 202621261
June 202618660
July 202621778
August 202618263
Crime categories in the latest complete year

A complete, consecutive 12-month period without an unresolved reporting break is needed before these totals can be shown.

What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Publication history: Sussex Police: Crime data not provided for January 2026. The force will provide a data refresh as soon as possible. No explicit later refresh identified in the checked changelog.

Previous crime-publication gaps are not explicitly resolved in the checked changelog for 2026-01. Published rows are retained, but completeness and year-on-year changes are not established.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Eastbourne →